2

Our blog has moved!

3

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://investeddevelopment.com
and update your bookmarks.

4

Friday, October 8, 2010

Weekly Review – October 3– October 9

(almost)Every week at Invested Development we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about… well, we read a lot.  

Can Wal-Mart make it in Africa?
Wal-Mart acquired South African-based Massmart, a retailer with 288 stores in 14 countries in sub-Saharan Africa for $4.1 billion. Critics of the deal point out that some of Wal-Mart’s international adventures have gone badly, most notably its expansion into Germany, which it eventually abandoned. However, The Economist argues in favor of the transaction and believes Wal-Mart has the potential to shape the African market from its infancy.
In response to concerns about fair lending processes, standardized rates, and a lack of transparency in microfinance institutions (MFIs), the Standard Chartered Bank, the Reserve Bank of India and the Indian Bankers Association will launch India Microfinance Platform (IMFP) will be established this month due to "over-heating, employee poaching, multiple lending, and lack of common reporting" in the sector. Ultimately the platform will standardize microfinance reporting and allow a joint loan portfolio audit of Indian microfinance heavyweights such as SKS Microfinance, Bandhan, and Equitas.

With the online population growing at far greater speed in developing and emerging markets than in North America and Western Europe, the opportunities for businesses and brands to prosper on an international scale are vast. To accomplish in obtaining a global brand, VentureBeat offered five tips including focused on localization and unified marketing. 

While the partnership was announced last spring, Marvell has formally committed $5.6 million to One Laptop per Child (OLPC). The grant will support OLPC’s efforts to create an affordable tablet called XO 3, which represents an evolution to their original product of the laptop. 

A cofounder of a Mint competitor discusses and reminisces over all the reasons and rumors in how and why his company Wesabe failed. While listing the reasons and either validating or dismissing the claim, this account should resonate with many entrepreneurs. His company while arguably the first in this space for online personal finances quickly became crowded with competitors and in a matter of a year, one company would be sold $170 million and the other would shut down its operations.


Friday, October 1, 2010

Weekly Review – September 25th – October 2th

(almost)Every week at Invested Development we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about… well, we read a lot.  

Five Winners Announced in Google's $10 Million Contest to Change the World
Finally after two years, Google has announced five winners of their $10 million challenge. The five projects combined will receive a total of $10 million to fund their ideas. The diverse selection of winners is the result of crowdsourced platform, wPosthich vetted thousands of ideas. The winners of this contest focus on a range of issues including innovative approaches to public transportation to providing an online and free educational platform.

Sunlight is the world's most plentiful resource. That is, of course, why the United States has scrambled in recent years to supplant dirty, nonrenewable energy sources with ambitious solar projects. In this article, Fast Company looks at some of the most exciting solar projects--both existing and planned--in the country.

This past week the Acumen Fund opened their applications for their fellowship program. The mission of the Acumen Fund Fellows Program is to build a corps of next generation social sector leaders by fusing operational and financial skills with moral imagination to create solutions to global poverty and fill the talent gap. Over the last five years, there have been 44 Fellows. Apply to be part of the class of 2012.

Teju Ravilochan is a co-founder of the Unreasonable Institute, an international accelerator for social ventures in Boulder, Colorado. This past summer the Institute brought together twenty-two social entrepreneurs across fifteen countries for a mentor-intensive program. Ravilochan reflects on the ten- week program and the major lessons he learned from the value of exposure to the importance of peer mentorship.

This past year our friends at First Light Ventures tried an innovative approach to seed investing. In four locations First Light committed a minimum of $150k and challenged entrepreneurs to vet their peers and make the investment decisions on behalf of their firms. These Village Capital Funds ultimately made investments in educational accountability software to direct trade coffee. This coming year First Light Ventures has partnered with one of their original partners at the Hub by committing a $750k seed fund.


Friday, September 24, 2010

Weekly Review – September 12th – September 25th

(almost)Every week at Invested Development we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week (ok, two weeks) we read a lot about… well, we read a lot.  

Investing in Africa: An Interview with Todd Moss from the Center for Global Development
It is clearly a tricky path to navigate, but the opportunities are growing. Mr. Moss highlights the two sectors that make up our investment focus, Energy and Mobile. It is clear that from both development and investment standpoints, that is where money needs to go.
Few people understand mobile money and financial services for emerging markets like Ignacio Mas. This article might not be his most in-depth explanation of the sector, but he presents a good overview of the need and opportunities.

To consider yourself a domain expert, it takes much more than being knowledgeable about current events in your respective industry. As Michael Lewis is quoted in this blog post: “if you’re reading about something in the papers it’s already too late.”

Developing a thick skin is necessary for entrepreneurs, according to Chris Dixon. Even as a respected angel investor and tech entrepreneur, he admits being rejected on a daily basis but this allows him to be ambitious and bold without fearing criticism or failure.

Mobile technology is being utilized across the aid industry. For example, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has dedicated $12 million to help village farmers in Tanzania, Cameroon and Rwanda save money through electronic mobile phone deposits. It has also launched a $10 million contest in Haiti to fund the best mobile banking ideas to channel earthquake relief to people who would otherwise stand in long lines at overwhelmed bank branches to collect cash.

Even the best products take time to get adopted. You can square that time for emerging markets where making a bad purchase can make the difference between eating and not. Seth Godin get to the real reason we need capital be patient, entrepreneurs to be committed.

Paul Polak is one of the favors of our field and a master of designing products/services for the poor in emerging markets. His advice should be taken seriously, but we would also caution against having too many “pilots” and not enough customers. Scaling is often a cash drain and investors like market penetration more than one-off pilots.


Monday, September 13, 2010

Weekly Review – August 29th – September 11th


(almost)Every week at Invested Development we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about the big picture issues surrounding impact investing.  

Publically Traded Social Impact: what does it mean for how we do business?
SKS Microfinance, one of the largest microfinance organizations in the world, recently issued an IPO that raised over $350 million. Started in 1997 as a nonprofit organization, SKS has grown from 2,000 borrowers in 2001 to 4.7 million in 19 states across India, with $1.8 billion disbursements and $554 million of loans on the books. Since going public, SKS has been the center of important discussion about the morality and implications of the IPO on social entrepreneurship.
Notes from gKenya
Kenya has just finished hosting a big Google-focused conference in its capital. For three days, 30+ Google employees have spent time with university students, programmers, entrepreneurs and marketers. Issues discussed include the high penetration of mobile devices, the expensive nature of broadband in Africa and affordability of gadgets and devices.  
U.S. Ranks Fifth in New Global Survey on Giving
This past week the US was ranked fifth in a survey based on giving habits in 153 countries. The survey was conducted by Charities Aid Foundation and found that 60 percent of Americans had donated money to an organization, 39 percent had volunteered their time to an organization, and 65 percent had helped a stranger in the previous month.
Top Ten Solar Venture Capital Investors
Considering the enthusiasm surrounding solar technology, GreenTech Media created a list of the top ten solar venture capital investors. Since this is an emerging space for investors, the list is compiled on the basis “for testicular fortitude, style points and sheer hype and vision.”
The big company vs a bootstrap
It is a modern day Goliath vs. David. In the past two weeks established global companies have especially challenged startups. Google and Nike have created products to directly compete with two popular startups: Sanebox and Runkeeper. Their response to this potential “threat” is admirable.

Monday, August 30, 2010

Weekly Review – August 15th – August 28th


(almost)Every week at Invested Development we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about…

Just another example of why it is impossible to predict what challenges a start-up will face. We hate to hear about entrepreneurs becoming the victim of uncontrollable circumstances and we also hate to hear that it puts our friends at Village Capital in jeopardy of not getting re-paid. Luckily, this story ends well…Victory! Change.org and Groupon Members Help Rescue Ethical Flip Flop Company Feelgoodz

This is from a couple of weeks ago, but we couldn’t miss the chance to promote our friends at Runa who where selected as Beyond Profit’s SE of the Day. We have known the guys at Runa since last summer and have been enjoying their Guayusa tea ever since.

For social entrepreneurs collaboration is always key, but even more so with those focused on rural markets. The sustenance farmers who inhabit the sparsely populated areas of emerging markets are amongst the worlds poorest and their dispersal makes reaching them expensive. ID portfolio company, FrogTek, is doing their part to help. By leveraging mobile technology, they are reducing costs and improving efficiency for small merchants in emerging markets and creating a platform for suppliers, financiers and customers to work with small, remote businesses.

Deborah Burand’s gap analysis of the fledgling microfranchise industry is a much-needed primer for those interested in leveraging the proven franchise model for entrepreneurship for economic development in emerging markets (and we are not just saying that because she is an ID ally.) With her new position as General Council for OPIC, she’ll be in a good position to influence the policy changes she is advocating.

Our good friend Deborah Burand made the rounds last week. This time in a lengthy interview with Next Billion blogger Josh Cleveland. The article provides nice insight into why Deborah believes microfranchising can pick-up where microfinance left off.

Nanako Kudo brings up discussion point for our industry. If capital is “patient”, what is it waiting for? Is it just a bridge to traditional capital? What then? It is something that we have been writing and thinking about a lot (see our blog post on patient capital here). 

Friday, August 13, 2010

Weekly Review – August 8th – August 14th


Every week at Invested Development we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about impact financing, from Angels to Stock Exchanges and everything in-between.

You would think that as often as we link to Nathaniel Whittemore’s articles, we would pop-up on his radar. Cleary, not yet. We have not only been making this argument for over a year, we actually built a company around it!

One criticism of Microfinance is that the businesses supported by micro-loans do little to solve the unemployment issues that plague emerging markets. It is an unfair criticism because mom-and-pops can’t become SME’s without growth financing and that is not what MFI’s are designed to do. We need more growth capital innovations like the one mentioned in this article to help MFI’s achieve their full potential.

If you follow our blog you know that we are big advocates for anything that helps create liquidity in impact investing. Luckily our friends at Mission Markets are almost ready to launch their two trading platforms, the Private Capital Marketplace and Mission Markets Earth. This is a great start and it won’t take long for them to build momentum.

Be sure to follow the link and read the entire interview. Durreen Shahnaz has an impressive background, but she is not alone in her efforts to build the first impact investment stock exchange. There are similar initiatives in Germany, South Africa, Canada? and London that we know about. The question is, will there be enough deals to keep them all busy?

The debate continues… and it should, we are far from defining ourselves as industry and even further from articulating that clearly to others. Unfortunately, as the article points out, I don’t think we are getting any closer. We agree social entrepreneurs should do-good not just do-no-harm and we have been writing about it a lot lately.

Another big debate in our industry is the definition of poverty. We wrote about this in our first blog post back in May. In that post, we supported the UN’s decision to move away from the hard $1.25 metric because poverty is the lack of access, not the scarcity of funds. It’s subtle difference, but very important. 

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Bees Do It for the Honey

At a recent social entrepreneurship forum we were amazed by the ideas and technologies being presented; mobile phone based eye diagnostics, safe and affordable infant incubators, and even affordable sanitary pads. Inspiring stuff.

What was less inspiring were the business models. Despite a clear realization of the high-impact each product could have, the massive market potential, and the obvious lack of large distribution networks, each technology was coupled with a non-profit designation and an “open-source” distribution scheme.

Now let’s be clear, when it comes to computer programming or scientific knowledge we support open source models (in particular the non-profit kind). Both are freely (or very affordably) distributed and have the benefit of existing distribution networks. But when it comes to products that are going to require that someone build a distribution network, create a marketing campaign, and ramp-up production capacity; open-source is probably not going to get it done.

People might think of this as callous or unimaginative but that is just an easy way out. We are not insensitive to oppose models that get peoples hopes up but never deliver. We are not cold-hearted to object to models that fail and leave people without a product they have become dependent on. Unfortunately, those of you who work in development probably can’t count the times that these scenarios have played out in the field

So what does this have to do with bees? Bees are remarkable creatures. They exist in complex societies and create far more good than harm. Yet their most important contribution to earth (and one of the most important contributions of any species!) is pollination.

Through pollination alone, bees contribute somewhere between $32 and $50 billion each year to U.S. agriculture production. Despite our modern agri-business, today bees help pollinate 1/3 of U.S. crops[1]. Think about the shear scale of that task.

Yet the interesting thing about their impact is that bees are doing this out of self-interest; not out of benevolence, guilt, or a sense of responsibility. They are the most productive pollinators on the planet and yet they don’t do it for the fruits or the flowers. Bees do it for the honey.

Social entrepreneurs, investors and aid organizations should stop and think about what we can learn from bees: Their self-interest not only does-no-harm, but actually does-good (a lot of it). They create value at both ends of the production cycle (pollination on one side and honey on the other). And, most importantly, they create tremendous benefit through scale (the average bee hive supports over 60,000 bees).

Bernard Mandeville long ago claimed that without private vices there is no pubic benefit[2]. He too used the self-interest of bees as a metaphor for the benefits of self-interest (in a much less flattering light than we are). For social entrepreneurs that self-interest can be a powerful tool for achieving public benefit. Especially when we harness it from those we are trying to benefit.

[1] These statistics are slightly old and probably under-represent the current impact. Taken from “Silence of the Bees - Impact of CCD on US Agriculture” at www.pbs.org/wnet/nature
[2] Mandeville, Bernard. “Fable of the Bees” published in 1724

Friday, August 6, 2010

Weekly Review – August 1st – August 7th

We missed last week, so this weeks Weekly Review has a few more stories then usual. In case you are new to the blog, every week at Invested Development, we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about clean water and mobile money.

This is a quick illustration of the many risks that remain for great ideas trying to become great ventures. We all too often fall in love with a concept, product or design only to loose focus on it’s implementation. For start-ups the risk to scale quickly can lead to botched implementation, high-costs, poor results and worst of all, disproof-of-concept. Another important topic mentioned, there is never one solution. Entrepreneurs and investors should continue supporting innovative twists, despite a few high profile competitors grabbing dollars and headlines.

Affordable clean water is a huge issue and a real opportunity for a creative social entrepreneur to go big while dramatically improving the lives of the world’s most needy. This article (the title alone) illustrates just how big a need it is and the next article highlights some unexpected solutions.

Just to highlight the pandemic that clean water is becoming; a Houston based company, S2C Global Systems has created a for-profit business that will ship bulk drinking water from Alaska to India. For anyone who is familiar with water’s more annoying qualities (it is heavy, hard to contain and evaporates at relatively low temperatures), this is a real eye-opener.

A look at how the Solar For All competition entrants are getting capital, but they are really missing the mark. Promethean Power, a third-place winner, got seed capital from very traditional sources like Quarcus Trust and one of Invested Development’s Angel Investors as well as ID partner First Light Ventures. We are certain they are not the only ones tapping for-profit investors.

This is a nice collection of videos from the Tech @ State event this past week in D.C. This particular collection of videos is from the Mobile Money panel featuring Ben Lyons (Frontline SMS: Credit & Kopo Kopo) and Raul Hinojosa (Transfercel), two entrepreneurs that ID is very familiar with.

The title says it all. This nifty video created by CGAP explains just how the M-PESA system works. It is the most successful mobile money platform in the world for a reason… to bad that it won’t work in many countries due to regulations prohibiting telecoms from acting like banks.

Literacy is becoming a key issue in the evolution of mobile banking. Unlike traditional banking (where clients can interact verbally), mobile banking requires that a user be literate (at least semi-literate). This is not a prerequisite for mobile phone use and many of the Worlds 4+ billion mobile phone users are indeed illiterate, especially when we look at the 1.25 billion unbanked mobile users.

Guido and the LavAmp team are also Unreasonable Fellows. We had an opportunity to meet the team on a recent trip to Boulder. The technology still needs some tweaking, but it has tremendous potential as an affordable diagnostic tool for both humans and animals.

Monday, August 2, 2010

Leveraging Mobile Ubiquity to Improve Life at the Base of the Pyramid

This post is the second of a series on mobile phones and the Base of the Pyramid. You can find the first of the series here.

In our previous post we explored the explosion of mobile phone access and the innovative businesses that enabled it. In the next two posts, we will look at companies and trends that are leveraging mobile access to provide valuable services to the poor in emerging markets.

SMS Enabled Services
SMS (Short Message Service), better known as text messaging, has had a tremendous impact everywhere in the world. To many of us, it is just a simple way to quickly communicate with friends and family. However, to an increasing number of people at the base of the period, it is an essential platform enabling everything from ad-hoc marketplaces to outsourced employmnent. This post will highlight a few of the innovative companies that are revolutionizing what we can do with regular cellphones to help some of the most needy people in the world.

Mass Texting for NGOs
An early service derived from the ubiquity of mobile phones is mass SMS or text messaging. At its most basic level, it provides an easy way for groups to communicate even where computers are impractical. FrontlineSMS for example, provides a platform for NGOs to manage texting lists (mailing lists, for text messages). Using this software, a NGO can reach out to their fieldworkers anywhere in the world, raise awareness for a campaign, run surveys through FrontlineSMS’s SurveyManager or reach specific individuals in a targeted community.

Mobile Payments
Mailing lists where just the beginning, even for Frontline SMS, as they have spun out several other services including Frontline SMS: Credit; a Mobile transaction service enabling MFI’s (microfinance institutions) to provide financial services via SMS messaging services.

Mobile banking platforms are too numerous to list. They are largely operated by established Telecom’s (e.g. Safaricom’s (Vodafone) mPesa) or Financial Institutions (e.g. ANZ’s Wing Money). However, what might be the most interesting innovation in mobile banking is largely being carved out by small start-ups like Kopo Kopo and SF Global that are creating neutral mobile transaction platforms that don’t require affiliation with a given telecom or financial institution.

Texting to make money
Beyond simply moving money using SMS technology, a few companies have figured out how to leverage mobile phones to directly contribute to the income generation of those who need it most.

TxtEagle has leveraged mobile ubiquity to develop paid micro tasks assigned to mobile users with a little free time and a need for cash. TxtEagle breaks simple tasks into small units so that individual mobile users around the world can complete a part of the task via SMS. In turn, the mobile users are paid in either airtime or mobile money.

Another great example is Empleo Listo!, the Latin Americas arm of US based Assured Labor. They are creatively using mobile technology to improve employment inefficiencies at the base of the pyramid. By creating an SMS enabled job listing and employment matching service, Empleo Listo! provides anyone with a mobile phone immediate access to jobs that are pre-screened to meet their specific requirements.

Final thoughts
The few examples here are just the tip of the iceberg and every week we see new innovations in mobile technology for the poor in emerging markets. The sheer size of the market is driving mainstream manufacturers to produce cheaper and cheaper products, but the real innovation is on the software side, where developers are finding ways to reinvent everything as affordable, empowering mobile apps. Next week we will look at smartphones and the massive potential that their computing power and connectivity create. 

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Truly Patient Capital - How We Can Create Systemic Change – Part 2


In our last post we introduced our Pareto Holdings concept. Pareto is a socially oriented holding company that swaps Preferred Stock shares in nescient (but profitable) impact ventures for its own Common Shares. The thought is that a large holding company’s Common Shares will be increasingly more liquid than a single investors Preferred Shares in an early stage company.

If you missed that post, here’s the link. We ended the last post before fully describing how stakeholders will benefit from Pareto. So we will pick up with that here.

Pareto Holdings – Who Will Benefit

The point of Pareto Holdings is not to make a financial killing. The point is to create systemic change by proving that patient capital is sustainable, profitable and powerful. To achieve that, it must be efficient, pragmatic and focused. With that said, managers cannot forget who the beneficiaries are and why they needed Pareto in the first place.

Benefit for Entrepreneurs

Impact Entrepreneurs are in a difficult position. They seek profits but must consider impact. They target those in need but not to exploit their lack of options. In many cases they take on risks and expenses well beyond those accounted for by their direct competitors (see our post on Impact Maximization for more on that).

The current models for financing Impact Entrepreneurs are not growing as quickly as the number of entrepreneurs with exceptional socially motivated start-ups. Philanthropic dollars are adapting but will never meet the growing gap. Traditional investors are also adapting, but their expectations and focus on massive returns will keep them from providing the support that is needed. 

Pareto could help meet the gap by encouraging more philanthropically minded investors and organizations to become Impact Angel (or seed stage) Investors. Currently, these players have no compelling options to bring them from the sidelines. Impactful equity investments present for-profit models that don’t fit traditional grant making qualifications and are far too risky for traditional Mission Related Investments[1]. The holding company model could create a third, more compelling reason for them to join in.

More importantly, Pareto could also change the relationship between investors and entrepreneurs. A long-term profit sharing focus is much more in-line with the day-to-day concerns of a business owner. Early stage investors are rightly focused on scale. It is much more important than profits in that it increases the likelihood of an exit event and they depend on exits for liquidity and profits. As a holding company, Pareto’s interests are proportionate to each company’s size and the focus is to make holdings sustainable and profitable over the long-term. That means impact entrepreneurs will start with the important focus on scale, then shift gears and focus on profits as they come under the umbrella of the Holding company.

Benefits for Impact Investors

Seed stage impact investors (or Impact Angels), the few that currently exist, are also in a difficult situation. They want to leverage their wealth to create lasting change. They want something more sustainable than charity but with more positive impact than traditional businesses. They want to help young ventures become successful enterprises but they don’t want them to forget their social missions in the process.  They want to be active investors.

Pareto was designed with their dilemma in mind (after all, they are our clients). Impact Angels are the fuel for the emerging industry and we won’t get far without more of them. Yet convincing more to join the ranks is very difficult because there are no compelling exit strategies that meet their desired outcomes.  The holding company model, with a proven commitment to positive impact, will create exits that meet their goal of getting a return on investment while keeping a careful eye on the original mission.

Benefits for Institutional Investors & Foundations

Exits are not the only benefit that Pareto will provide. Individuals and institutions currently lack liquid investments that are high impact (the do-good kind). Pareto will sell shares to impact investors that benefit from the diversity and stability of a large portfolio while maintaining a deep commitment to improving the lives of those less fortunate.  Pareto’s support for Full Cost Accounting methods, direct impact and long-term growth will make it easy for investors to assess the impact of their funds (and easy to explain to their clients).

Pareto Holdings – Making It Happen

This is a very BIG idea and we are still a small company. As entrepreneurs our first inclination is to run out and try to make this happen on our own. As sensible human beings, we know better. We need to bat this idea around with other BIG thinkers in the industry so that it can take shape. In business the devil is in the details and Pareto has a lot of details.  We need experts to weigh-in, warn us of potential pitfalls, and point us in the right direction. Finally, we need momentum. New ideas are hard to get moving, but once they do, momentum alone will take them far. As a small company, there is probably nothing more difficult for us to do than create momentum. All we can do is keep talking, keep writing and hope that some of you join us.


[1] Mission Related Investments (MRI) are a tool used by foundations to make mission oriented investments that seek returns. A quick guide (with links to guides) can be found here: http://bit.ly/cHT0lh

Friday, July 23, 2010

Weekly Review - July 18th - 24th


Every week at Invested Development, we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about start-ups a little about laptops.

These guys might not have the statistics right (Dunn & Bradstreet estimates that over 80% of start-ups are not in business after 5 years), but the advice is solid. Recruiting a strong Board of Advisors is essential and will make an entrepreneurs life a lot easier if they are good. We would only add one additional selection criteria to the list. Make sure they your Board members are willing to speak-up and push back and that you respect them enough to listen.

If you couple this reading with the previous article you will understand our reservations about the present incarnation of this bill. Imagine the pressure the entrepreneurs will face. Beyond the normal pride-crushing, credit-killing, 401K depleting, friend-and-family-fracturing hell that many failing entrepreneurs go through, these guys will also face the prospect of deportation (along with their families).

Microfinance is a big part of start-up firms in emerging markets (and to much smaller extent in the U.S.) It is also the precursor to Impact Investing and still commands the lion’s share of socially responsible investments (SRI) made in emerging markets. So it is now surprise that we think questioning the morality of investors making money of microfinance as relevant. Contrary to what you might think, we don’t agree with the author’s defense of microfinance investors making big bucks (or his childish portrayal of loan sharks as violent thugs – see this post about Gurski’s Loan Sharks). The issue is not profits, but the growing distance between customer and decision maker.

This is starting to feel like the search for the Holy Grail (remember, they never found it), but we like the initiative. This is also interesting because it is not a private sector, free market initiative. It looks like the state did a great job of spearheading the R&D, and is ready to outsource manufacturing. Let’s just hope they don’t try to take on distribution themselves or that $35 might be more like $300 delivered.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Truly Patient Capital - How We Can Create Systemic Change – Part 1

Over the last few posts we have been sharing our thoughts on the industry in general.  We started ID last year because there was a need in the market for seed investment capital for impact-oriented startups. We thought the solution was simple. Let’s do what they did in Silicon Valley! Then came reality.
Silicon Valley has throngs of experienced industry executives with deep pockets fresh off their latest IPO. They not only throw money at countless start-ups but share years of experience and can open up Rolodex as thick as the Palo Alto Yellow Pages. Impact investing has good intentions and money.
No problem, we thought, we can create a business and pair our industry experience and contacts with would-be Angel Investors capital. Problem solved! Well, maybe not. Invested Development began with just that mission and is still doing that today. But one year later, we have realized that despite a lot of progress, we can’t possibly change the game with our current model alone.

The Problem

Although a few Impact Angel Investors and non-profit investors have emerged to provide seed funding for socially motivated start-ups, we need to attract many, many more. Impact investing is getting hyped and the money will continue to trickle in. As an industry, Impact Investing has grown by 22% per year since 2001. Conservative estimates suggest the market will reach $500 billion over the next 10 years[1].  These are impressive numbers, not to be downplayed, but let’s put it in perspective. We are still talking about 1% of total assets under management.  And even then, most of that money is institutional Socially Responsible Investments with a do-no-harm, social screening[2] mantra; not a do-good promotion of companies that put their social missions first[3].  Systemic change will require that we do more of the latter.

One Solution – Pareto Holdings

Pareto Holdings is a concept that we have been throwing around here for the past six months. In a nutshell, it is a socially oriented holding company that swaps Preferred Stock shares in nescient (but profitable) social ventures for its own Common Shares. The thought is that a large holding company’s Common Shares will be increasingly more liquid than a single investors Preferred Shares in an early stage company. Overtime, the steady stream of dividend disbursements (and profit sharing) will create an attractive, steady, and reliable return for institutional investors and progressive government funds (a.k.a. the Dutch Lottery system). The end result is steep reduction in liquidity risk for Impact Angel Investors and added velocity to their investment cycle.
I won’t pretend that we have run the necessary models, dug into the necessary details or even interrogated the underpinning assumptions sufficiently. But we have put a good bit of thought into why it’s needed and who will benefit from it.

How It Will Work

The general concept is that Impact Angels face liquidity risk well beyond their projected returns (odd how you can project returns without a clear liquidity event… but we’ll save that for a different post). Additionally, even theoretical exits in this industry are plus-minus.  Scaling an enterprise is much easier when you can attract a buyer, but attracting a buyer often means jeopardizing your social mission. Pareto solves both issues by creating an exit scenario that is more predictable (largely focused on the company having profits) and socially palatable (missions will stay intact because Pareto investors are motivated by that part as well).
Let’s outline a few more details on how it will work:
Preferred Stock: For Pareto Holdings to generate cash, it will rely on cash dividends (or profit sharing) from Preferred Stock shares in young, but profitable, social ventures. Shares will likely be negotiated as straight, perpetual preferred stocks with guaranteed or floating dividends (however, this will take considerably more research and projections).
Share Exchange: Angel investors often receive Preferred Stock shares for their seed investments. These shares lack voting rights but guarantee dividends once the company becomes profitable. However, most Angel investors are not interested in the dividend income. They are more focused on exiting the investment, regaining liquidity, and re-investing that capital into new start-ups.  Pareto will assist them by exchanging highly liquid Common Shares in Pareto Holdings for their less liquid (but dividend yielding) Preferred Stock in qualified social ventures.
Dividend Cash Flow: By creating a pool of dividend yielding shares, Pareto Holdings will create a diversified, consistent and profitable model for long-term social investments.  The benefits gained from negotiated dividend terms, priority (dividend and liquidation) and perpetuity will offset the rare upside risk of not holding common shares or convertible debt instruments.
Traded Shares: Overtime, Pareto Holdings will create a large enough pool to yield secure and sound returns for socially oriented investors seeking liquid investments with a proven commitment to impact investing.

The why and how are probably enough to digest in a single post. I’ll follow up in our next post with more on Pareto and how each stakeholder will benefit. 
[1]  Monitor Institute - “Investing for Social & Environmental Impact”, 2009
[3] For more on the difference between do-no-harm and do-good, read our previous two posts Investing in Development and Impact Maximization

Friday, July 16, 2010

Weekly Review - July 11th - July 17th

Every week at Invested Development, we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about alternative energy with some mobile tech thrown in for good measure:


If you follow our work at all you know that there is not shortage of solutions to rural electrification in Africa. This is another illustration of how NGO’s are currently leading the effort for off-grid solutions, but market solutions are not far behind. For every Barefoot College, there is a Barefoot Power (or EGG-energy). Investment should continue to grow in the area. The problem is big enough for a lot of players and large state-level solutions are just not going to happen, as a Kenyan Minister of Energy is quoted saying “National power grid connections require huge capital investments with the scattered nature of rural settlements that require off grid stations making this unattainable in the near future.”

This one slipped by us last week, but it’s worth highlighting now. It is amazing that even in an emerging market with tremendous poverty, like India, handset providers are starting to compete on more than price. A handset with a built in mosquito repellant! Now that is genius.

It might sound like a disparaging joke (i.e. “ever heard of the [name your oft derided group] invention? A solar light bulb!”) but in the end it might just be brilliant. Solar lamps have become vogue (we reported of the recent $5 million investment in solar lamp maker d.light design) but this might be a more practical solution. The fixtures are standard. In areas with limited electricity it is especially a boon as they are likely already wired for electricity.

Ontarios is probably taking a step in the right direction, even if this is horribly unpopular and imperfect. A few weeks back we blogged about the importance of Full Cost Accounting, or companies incorporating all the costs of production into the products. Until the IRS or WTO require the practice, it will be up to Cities to make sure companies incorporate the cost of their products full life-cycles.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Weekly Review - July 4th - July 10th

Every week at Invested Development, we scan the web for articles that relate to what we do and what we like. This week we read a lot about big pictures issues in development and cross border investing:

Thanks to the World Bank, investors finally have a simple, informative website with just about all they need to know about a countries regulations on direct foreign investment. Of course, knowing is just half the battle. Now we have to work on making it cheaper to actually do it. Until we can inspire and scale local Angel Investors, we need aggressively push down the costs of cross border investing.

The Douglas Adams reference alone was enough to make us read this! The feedback loop created by capitalism is by far it’s greatest asset, and Aid/charities greatest detriment. It can be dangerous to take this line of thought too far and we have to make sure not to use it as an excuse to ignore suffering.

Nathaniel Whittemore’s articles are becoming a staple of our Weekly Review’s, and with good reason. He gets it. A lot of people try to silo entrepreneurs, but this is a great example of how even traditional entrepreneurs can have tremendous social impact. Business can bring people together, even in one of the most divided regions in the world.

Danone (Dannon in the U.S) are the guys who bought Stoneybrook Farms, and it looks like the influences are going upsteam, not down as people feared. This made us think about how companies like Stoneybrook and Ben & Jerry’s have managed to keep their missions after acquisition. Luckily, the Trusteeship Institute has created an amazing video library of successful mission driven entrepreneurs talking about keeping their values post acquisition. 

Friday, July 2, 2010

Weekly Review - June 28th - July 2nd

As every week, our team looked for the best articles on the web concerning social entrepreneurship and impact investing. Today we share with you interesting ideas and initiatives from Change.org, NextBillion etc.

And happy 4th of July!!

An honest look back at three lessons learned by Waste Ventures in their failure to secure a 2010 Echoing Green Fellowship.  If we have heard it once, we have heard it a thousand times – sometimes failure teaches more than success.  All entrepreneurs can benefit from these lessons whether they are talking with investors, looking to secure a partnership or competing for a fellowship.

Rishabh Kaul of Next Billion details his work with Sarvajal, a company utilizing a microfranchising model to provide clean drinking water in Gujurat, India.  Rishabh spent a month working and living with Sarvajal franchisees in order to better understand the issues they face day to day. This article underscores the importance of understanding microfranchising models from the top down in order for francisees and franchisors to realize the most mutual benefit.

Kerri Feazell shares three ways a non-profit designation can hamstring an organization.  The validity of the points themselves have generated lots of discussion in the comments section.  Yet, we feel this continues to demonstrate the need for legal structures (B-corp, L3C) that split the difference between for-profit and non-profit.

Nathaniel Whittenmore comments on a New York Times article regarding the commercialization of university research.  Undoubtedly we need to do better in taking some of the groundbreaking research being done today to market.  Hopefully this initiative from the National Science Foundation’s Partnership for Innovation can lead the way.


Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Mobile Phones at the Base of the Pyramid: Accessibility and Affordability

This is our first post in a series on mobile technology’s proliferation and impact on the poor in emerging markets. We will highlight the players that helped create demand and the innovative ideas that continue to drive it.
Why Mobile Matters
Numerous studies have proven that connectivity increases income. For example, Robert Jensen, economics professor at Harvard, developed a study that tracked fishermen in southern India. The study found that by investing in cell phones, fishermen were able to quickly contact potential buyers for their daily catch, enabling faster and more efficient trading that increased their revenues by 8% and decreased the overall market price of fish by 4%[1]. Inspired by Jensen’s study, scholars at the London Business School have extrapolated the findings to conclude that for every 10 additional mobile phones per 100 habitants, the GDP of a country increases by 0.5% yearly[2].
Grameen Telecom – A Pioneer in Mobile Accessibility
 In 1996 Grameen Telecom pioneered the concept that mobile phones had a market at the bottom of the pyramid. Created through a joint initiative between Dr. Muhammad Yunus and Iqbal Quadir, the Village Phone combined microfinance and mobile technology in order to microfranchise access to mobile services.
The model enabled entrepreneurial women in Bangladesh to start a business through the purchase of a mobile phone with financing from the Grameen Bank.  These Village Phone operators would then charge other villagers for its use, generating revenue that enabled them to pay back the loan and eventually realize profitability. Since 1996, Grameen Telecom has grown to over 270,000 Village Phone operators in 50,000 villages across three countries.[3]  
The success of the Grameen Phone is important not only because of how it directly increased access to mobile services, but also in that it proved the viability of a previously untapped market. It showed the world that there was a vastly unmet demand for mobile technology at the BOP and demonstrated how mobile connectivity can benefit both businesses and the people they serve.
Demonstrated market growth
Since 1996 the explosion of mobile access has been global.  Mobile penetration in Bangladesh jumped from 0.0034% to 28% in 2008.  In Angola, it went from 0.25% to 39%. The growth trend has been even greater in Senegal, Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda and Colombia, which now boast 88% penetration rates (comparable to those of the United States and France at 88% and 94% respectively[4].) Looking at mobile penetration increases in the last decade, and extrapolating the trend[5], it is clear a vast majority of the world will be connected via mobile very soon.[6] 


Ultra Low Cost Handsets and Prepaid Minutes
Obviously the main barrier to increasing mobile penetration rates is the high upfront cost of mobile phones. Although the Village Phone is relatively inexpensive to access, it only allows people to communicate on a limited basis. People using the Grameen Phone cannot receive text messages and lack a unique phone number that they can provide to others.
To benefit from accessibility, users at the BOP need to own a mobile handset or at least have greater flexibility than what can be provided by a Village Phone Operator. Yet despite a growing array of ultra low cost handsets (ULCHs) like the Vodafone 150 (retailing for $15 in India and Africa), mobile handsets are still too expensive for many users.
Phone Sharing Beyond the Village Phone
Until phone prices drop further, phone sharing will remain a prevalent method of enabling accessibility.  However, sharing a number is no longer required. Today, users are able to purchase Sim cards that come loaded with minutes – an individual can then swap Sim cards in and out of shared phones in order to access their own contact lists and use only their own minutes.
More recently a technology known as the Virtual Sim has surfaced. The Virtual Sim functions just like a traditional SIM card except that it is cloud-based and is virtually transferred from phone to phone with a code. Using a borrowed handset, Virtual Sim users input a code to “flash” the handset and access their own information. Privacy is protected as they cannot access the phone’s original phonebook and call log. When they are done using the phone, they log out and it returns to the owner’s original settings.
Companies like Comviva[7] and Movirtu[8] have developed Virtual SIM platforms that allow phone-sharing on any handset. In Movirtu’s case, when the owner of a mobile handset shares their phone with a friend they receive a small payment from the telecom operator –transforming virtually any mobile phone owner into a Village Phone operator.
Where we go from here
The Village Phone, Comviva and Movirtu have shown that the world is now well on the path to increasing accessibility and affordability and that soon enough the entire world will be connected.  Innovative technologies and business models continue to drive down the cost of mobile ownership both by lowering the upfront costs of handsets and by creating flexibility with pay-as-you-go airtime and phone sharing.  This is good for social and financial inclusion of the poor, and will ultimately provide a powerful platform to bridge the gap between the developed and developing world.
In the next post of our mobile series we will explore how companies, NGOs and governments are leveraging this growing mobile penetration to drive economic development and create social benefit.






[4] UN data, accessed from Gapminder World on June 3, 2010
[5] Mobile phone penetration in the last 10 years, Developed vs. Developing World – A graph Ray Kurzweil would love, showing the exponential growth of cell phone penetration http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/ict/graphs/mobile.jpg Accessed on June 20, 2010
[6] Mobile and fixed phone penetration in Africa 1996-2006 http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/ict/graphs/af1.jpg Accessed on June 20, 2010
[8] http://www.movirtu.com/index-4c.html Accessed on June 20, 2010