2

Our blog has moved!

3

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://investeddevelopment.com
and update your bookmarks.

4

Friday, September 30, 2011

Weekly Review September 26-30

People often ask us why we chose technology as our investment focus. The answer is quite simple: technology has the greatest potential to create impact in the developing world. The following articles for this week share our sentiment and speak to mobile technology’s power for social impact (be sure to check out next week’s Review to see how alternative energy is creating impact).

Source
Mobile Broadband in Kenya” by Patrick Munyi on iHub Blog
Kenya has been the shining star of mobile technology innovation in Africa, largely fueled by high mobile penetration and the installation of undersea fiber cables in 2009. The folks at iHub Nairobi have collected data regarding mobile technology and mobile broadband usage in Kenya.  They have found that broadband speeds are increasing alongside the number of users and that most access the Internet with their phone; “98% of mobile subscribers use mobile internet.” More important are the affects mobile Internet will have on the Kenyan economy. iHub writes, “It is predicted that mobile broadband can potentially increase national productivity and growth by up to 15%.” Access to mobile phones, and therefore mobile broadband, will made a significant improvement in the continued development of Kenya.

 “Crises in the Digital Age” by Michael Fertik, CEO and Founder of Reptuation.com, on World Economic Forum Blog
Michael Fertik reflects on the attitude world leaders had on Internet at the World Economic Forum in Davos this year. All agreed and wanted to know more about how the Internet “spreads information, misinformation, rumor, innuendo, and fact.” While the Internet can cause a stir, the information it channels to underserved populations is critical. Fertik writes of the impact the Internet has in times of crisis or disaster. We agree that technology creates impact by absorbing and transmitting information, and add that it doesn’t just have to be in times of crisis.

Katrin Verclas, founder of MobileActive.org, has been honored as one of the most influential women in technology this year. Her site is a “hub for people around the world who are building tools for mobile phones that make a difference.” Her site unites the large community of technology innovators who are working to create technologies that empower the world’s underserved populations. This way, innovators can share their experiences and expertise to create affordable and scalable products and services for the underserved. By promoting the development of applications and mobile technologies, we can leverage mobile ubiquity to create social impact. Congratulations to Katrin Verclas and thanks for propelling the technology for impact space forward.

It’s not just small social enterprises that have caught on the potential at the BoP and technology’s power for impact. The IT giant Hewlett-Packard (HP) is expanding its operations in Africa with 10 new entities throughout the continent. Business customers, governments, and individuals will have improved access to HP’s hardware and software. Governments especially will be able to leverage HP technology “to drive economic growth by modernizing the delivery of services in key areas such as education, healthcare, and e-Government services.” By penetrating the market, HP will drive increased adoption of technology and promote sustainable economic development. HP’s presence alone will create jobs and stability throughout their communities. HP also has plans for many other initiatives to collaborate with universities, innovate in African education and extend social innovation programs.

Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Bring your idea to enterprise with BETA

Friday, September 23, 2011

Weekly Review September 19-23

Source
Banks and mobile network operators are working in an environment that is constantly evolving with the addition of new competitors, new regulations (or lack thereof), and new markets. The mobile payments world in emerging markets is experiencing explosive growth and widespread support, as evidenced in the following articles.

First universal mobile payments platform goes live” on Mobile Money Africa
Luup is now providing universal mobile payment systems through a combination of Microsoft BizTalk Server and Temenos T24, a core banking software used around the world. Luup CEO Martin Wilson claims that the platform can serve corporate and retail users in both developed and developing markets on any mobile device on any mobile network. Successful mobile payment platforms are scalable and fall in line with regulatory and security requirements. Luup believes their service meets these criteria, “connecting senders and receivers of funds across the globe.” The integration of Temenos T24, a technology used in “over 1000 financial institutions in more than 125 countries across the world,” implies that Luup is highly adaptable and is likely to be successful globally.

Banks have some good news… are they listening? by Kabir Kumar on CGAP
Although these are tough times for banks, a recent research project on branchless banking by CGAP, the Inter-American Development Bank, and Akya (a banking consultancy) found some good news. Branchless banking, though fiercely competitive in emerging markets between banks and MNOs, can present new and opportunistic business cases for banks. There are five key findings regarding the business case for banks in the collaborative report. First, a critical factor to success in branchless banking is a strong agent network. At low transaction volumes, in rural areas for example, an agent is the most economical option. Second, banks offer branchless banking because it is an additional and efficient channel to reach unbanked or under banked segments. This allows them to grow their market share, while increasing cash flow activity. Third, a strong agent network adds value for a branchless banking customer by offering a new level of convenience. Fourth, branchless banking promotes growth of the bank and markets, and also reaches new geographies and customers. Finally, banks practicing branchless-banking practices will find that payments can make a substantial contribution to profit. The full presentation, “Understanding the business case for banks in branchless banking” is available here.

Liberate mobile payments for more inclusive economy” by Wesley Lynch on Mobile Money Africa
Despite the tremendous adoption of mobile money penetration in Africa, South Africa’s rate of adoption has been lagging in comparison. Wesley Lynch, CEO of Realmdigital, blames this on the regulatory environment in South Africa. The restrictive banking regulations also limit innovation from MNOs who could offer cheap and easy mobile transaction services to customers at the BoP. M-PESA’s famous success in Kenya has not been repeated in South Africa, “a country with 13 million unbanked citizens.” The major obstacle for mobile network operators to behave as banks has been government regulation. Once mobile network operators can obtain banking licenses in South Africa, the mobile payment ecosystem will open up a new, liberated economy.

Nigeria: GSMA to Partner State on Mobile Money” by Obinna Chima on AllAfrica
The mobile payment industry in Nigeria has the support of the Global System for Mobile Communication Association (GSMA). The GSMA promises to ensure the successful adoption of mobile money in the country by working closely with the federal government and key banks and mobile network operators. Mobile payments transactions could improve trade and commerce significantly in Nigeria thanks to the high level of mobile penetration and the high number of unbanked citizens. Mr. Ross Bateson of the GSMA stated that mobile money would increase productivity and improve the Nigerian economy. Additionally, there are other opportunities beyond mobile payments that access to mobile can offer to enable development.

Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Idea to enterprise with BETA

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Cents and Responsibility

Source
Every week we speak to entrepreneurs who are eagerly seeking financing for their start-ups. Despite the start-up moniker, many have been struggling for months and even years. They have probably passed up jobs, ended significant relationships, faced the ridicule of family and friends, and lost sleep over bills and bank accounts. They are, in a word, desperate.

It’s important for investors to recognize this. Look past the calm exterior, the confident pitch face, the exaggerated success claims, and the impressive resumes. More often than not, entrepreneurs are highly intelligent, wholeheartedly passionate, and despairingly insecure people who desperately need approval. We say this with the utmost respect for the entrepreneurs. It takes a tremendous amount of courage to walk into the lion’s den, especially with a preexisting defeated and desperate mindset. Nevertheless, investors should not coddle and string along every entrepreneur that pitches to them. On the contrary, these entrepreneurs need a healthy dose of reality that an investor has the power, and responsibility, to provide. They’ll thank you for it later.

In some circles, ID has developed a reputation as being “straightforward” (to use a pleasant euphemism) and maybe even a little harsh. That wasn’t always the case. In the beginning, like many other impact investors, we were quickly enamored with entrepreneurs’ “narratives” in pitch sessions. Therefore, our hearts didn’t let our mouths utter what our minds were thinking. We let the entrepreneurs leave meetings with a glimmer of hope that we would be following up with an investment, even when we knew that we wouldn’t. However, this does no good for the worn-out entrepreneur, who could be compared to a starving artist. Over time, we have discovered that a firm “NO” coupled with actionable advice for moving forward helps an entrepreneur much more than false hope. We have learned our lesson and we hope that other investors will follow suit.

As investors, we have a responsibility to be upfront and honest (call it harsh if you like). With all due respect to the entrepreneur, investors should follow a simple set of rules to manage mutual expectations:
  1. Know your own investment criteria: If you really don’t invest until they have trailing revenue, don’t “diligence” the kids that just won the MIT $100K. If you only invest in financial inclusion, don’t chat up solar energy start-ups (even if their founder did just speak at TEDx). 
  2. Speak your mind: If the business model fails to impress you, tell them why. If the entrepreneur fails to instill confidence, let them know. It will probably be uncomfortable, but shouldn’t be confrontational. 
  3. Limit letters of commitment: LOIs are an easy way to buy time for your investment committee to continue to deliberate, but they set expectations for entrepreneurs that are often not met. If you’re going to invest, just do it. If not, just say it. 
  4. Just say “No”: It’s not only a bastion of Reagan era drug policy, it’s also a great way to keep expectations in check. Don’t waste time if you’ve already made your decision. Offer a referral, constructive criticism, and a genuine smile, but don’t waiver, don’t defer, and don’t let the entrepreneur wedge the door back open if you really aren’t going to follow through. 
Last week, our Weekly Review highlighted articles that spoke to the great sense of responsibility that rests with impact investors and social entrepreneurs. An investor’s responsibility begins with the entrepreneur. However, in addition to being responsible to entrepreneurs, impact investors must be mindful of the future impact of their investments on the environment, local communities, and individuals. It’s not an easy task and it’s one that the investor and entrepreneur tackle together. To manage their responsibilities effectively, the pair needs to have a strong relationship made possible with honesty and trust from the start. This means clearly communicating interests and expectations and that starts with intent to invest (or not).

Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Idea to enterprise with BETA

Friday, September 16, 2011

Weekly Review September 12-16

Inevitably, Money creates power and with power comes great responsibility. Impact investors have the power to enable social enterprises to create change while developing solutions for underserved markets. Reflected in their mission statements, they also have the responsibility to work closely with social entrepreneurs to make this happen.  The following articles from this week review the different responsibilities investors and entrepreneurs have and ways they fulfill them.

Namibia: Call to Invest in SMEs” by Magreth Nunuhe on AllAfrica
Namibia’s  Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry, Tjekero Tweya explains how the private sector, with the support of the government, can, “bring about material change to the living conditions of all Namibians.” Entrepreneurs with a commitment to innovation and investors who take responsibility for their entrepreneurs working in emerging markets will find that they’re actually enabling the development of the market. Tweya stated: “The successful economies of the world have not been created by fate, they have been created by deliberate efforts of perfecting the art of innovation.” By working closely together, entrepreneurs and investors seeking to create social impact in countries like Namibia can leverage resources and networks to foster innovation.

Ebrahimi, founder of ReadyForZero , writes about what really matters for startups. Stating that many startups get caught measuring success by their ability to fundraise, Ebrahimi iterates that the real measure of success for a startup is people (customers). This caveat especially applies to social entrepreneurs who create businesses to spread impact to as many people as possible. It doesn’t matter how much funding social entrepreneurs receive, but rather the scale of the impact and the number of people positively affected. Ebrahimi writes that entrepreneurs often fall into the trap of focusing on raising venture capital rather than on their vision.. Investors, especially impact investors, have a responsibility to their entrepreneurs to focus their energies on creating startups that matter: “make something people want (and need).”

In the wake of SOCAP, the impact investing industry has been reflecting on the different ways that people are powering capital to drive impact investments. Ross Baird, executive director of Village Capital, developed a new way of connecting social capital markets. Inspired by microfinance, Village Capital accelerates the impact investing space by connecting entrepreneurs and investors through peer support organizations. At SOCAP, Baird moderated the “People Powered Capital” panel, during which entrepreneurs shared stories about their experiences working with Village Capital. A key takeaway from the talk was the collaborative nature that social entrepreneurs and impact investors experience while working in the peer-powered networks.  Within the social capital markets, entrepreneurs and investors are responsible for working together to scale up and sustain the social enterprises that create the impact. Peer-powered networks like Village Capital make this possible.

SOCAP Redux” by Paul Hudnut on BOPreneur
Paul Hudnut recaps his SOCAP experience as a panelist, where he offered an entrepreneur’s perspective on raising capital for social ventures in the developing world. At ID, we especially like Hudnut’s first lesson learned, which he shared on the panel. Hudnut advises entrepreneurs to think of raising capital as “hiring investors.” Investors, especially impact investors, must offer a good organizational fit, live up to their role and make a sufficient time commitment through both the good times and the tough times. The relationship between an entrepreneur and his investor must be strong and in sync.  They have a responsibility to keep each other “in the loop.”  


Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Learn more about BETA

Friday, September 9, 2011

Weekly Review September 5 – 9

Image Source: Samsung
There’s never a shortage of news surrounding mobile technology. This week we read about new applications and smartphones, mobile money launching in Liberia and Zimbabwe, and the changes in the relationships between banks and telcos because of the growing popularity in mobile payments globally.

Samsung launches Galaxy S II in Kenya” by Stewart Chabwinja via IT News Africa
There has been speculation that smartphones, which are coming down in price, will penetrate the African market and slowly replace “dumb phones.” Samsung Electronics has launched the Galaxy S II, an Android-powered smartphone in Kenya. It is expected that smartphones will drive Internet penetration in Kenya. Kenyans value their phones because of the many value-added services that leading mobile operators provide, most notably M-PESA and all of the other applications surrounding the mobile money transaction system.

iHub and Akirachix are bringing AppCircus to Nairobi, Kenya where 12 groups will pitch their apps in front of an international jury of industry experts. AppCircus is “a unique global traveling showcase of the most creative and innovative apps presented by their creators during some of the most influential international events in mobile/web.” The best apps will be nominated for the Mobile Premier Awards 2012, to be held during the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. A list of the apps that are presenting is available at the end of the article. Some highlights include CrowdPesa, an app that locates M-PESA agents or ATMs in the local area, and 3GInnovators, an app that compares prices, ratings, and offers on products and services.

The Central Bank of Liberia has given approval to Lonestar Cell MTN and Ecobank-Liberia to partner and provide a mobile money product in the Liberian market. The product platform is going by the simple title of “Mobile Money.” Lonestar Cell MTN is the largest mobile services provider and the first telco in Liberia. Mobile phone penetration is around 45% in Liberia, while fixed line penetration is less than 1%, due to unrepaired telephone lines damaged during wartime (stats via PPIAF). In addition, “only 10% of Liberians have bank accounts.” This, coupled with growing mobile penetration, presents an ideal market opportunity for mobile money.

Econet Wireless, the largest telco in Zimbabwe, announced this week that it will be launching its mobile money service this month. The m-wallet is currently being piloted and will be live by the end of the month. In 2009, according to World Bank data, Zimbawe’s mobile penetration was around 3 million subscribers, or 25% of the population. In 2011, The Paypers reports that Econet’s customer base has grown to around 5 million since 2009. The market is experiencing explosive growth. Econet is capitalizing on the window of opportunity and leveraging its 73% market share. Its new mobile wallet can be used for purchases or transfers worth USD $20 or less.

In the never-ending effort to understand the complex world that is mobile payments, we often compare mobile payments in the developing world to banking in the developed world. The relationships between telcos and banks are reaching new, unprecedented stages. Already seen in Asia and Africa, telcos are acting like banks. In Canada, “mobile carrier Rogers has filed to become a bank under Canada’s federal Bank Act.” By doing this, Rogers will have the chance to earn a percentage of the revenue from payments transferred over a mobile phone. The mobile payments industry is expected “to become a $670 billion market by 2015,” (notably driven by developing countries, where mobile payments will double by 2015).  Although there are vast differences in banks between the developed and developing world, it seems that the gap may begin to close, as users tend to rely on their phones more often.


Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Learn more about BETA

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

SOCAP11


SOCAP11 was the inspiration for last week’s Weekly Review and the conference is finally here. The Invested Development team has had good experiences at SOCAP in the past, including our first introduction to social entrepreneur Femi Akinde and his company, SlimTrader, now an ID portfolio company. This year we’re hoping to meet new entrepreneurs and learn about their exciting new technological solutions to poverty. We’ll also be contributing to the conversation; you’ll find Invested Development team members on three panels at SOCAP11.
SOCAP provides a unique opportunity to bring together social entrepreneurs and impact investors who have a similar mindset. Although we may work across different industries such as mobile technology, healthcare, water, sanitation, or clean energy, we share the same motive. Impact investing is a collaborative effort with a mission to inject capital where it can make a powerful difference in the lives of the undeserved. Events like SOCAP are helping to ensure it stays that way.  

Connecting with investors and entrepreneurs is essential, but we attend SOCAP each year for many reasons. One important reason is contributing to thoughts and discussions surrounding the impact investing space. This year we have the privilege of participating in three panels, but there are other ways we can all keep the dialogue going year around. For example, the respected NextBillion blog recently published a conversation-stirring article entitled “The Dangerous Promise of Impact Investing.”  As a team, we felt obligated to contribute to the conversation and wrote a rebuttal, “The (Not So) Dangerous Promise of Impact Investing.” This was a healthy discussion designed to push the conversation surrounding impact investing forward.

We are grateful to the NextBillion for keeping the dialogue alive and look forward to other opportunities, beyond annual events like SOCAP, to continue debating the important issues in our field.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Weekly Review August 29 - September 2

As usually is the case before a SOCAP conference, ID’s RSS reader is filled with news, thoughts, and opinions on impact investing, where “money meets meaning.” Here are some highlights that we found interesting, and watch for a post next week on why ID is attending SOCAP.

How I Did It:  EBay’s Founder on Innovating the Business Model on Social Change” by Pierre Omidyar via Harvard Business Review 
How do you facilitate high net-worth individuals who are seeking to leverage their capital to create real impact, rather than just investing "socially responsibly"? Pierre Omidyar, eBay founder behind Omidyar Network, chronicled his journey of becoming an impact investor in an article in the Harvard Business Review. After eBay went public, Omidyar found himself immersed in unexpected wealth. After a couple years of donating here and there as a nonprofit family foundation, Omidyar needed to professionalize and structure the foundation with a defined strategy. He knew the amount of social impact that a business can have, demonstrated by eBay itself and its creation of new markets, livelihoods, and careers for people around the world. Omidyar sought “to harness the incredible power of business in order to make the world better” with his newfound wealth. Working with advisers, he overcame legal and structural hurdles to develop a limited liability corporation that employs staff members who conduct due diligence on investments in both nonprofit and for-profit companies. Thus, Omidyar Network broke ground on what we know as the impact investing circuit and blend the values of mission-driven non-profit managers and for-profit venture capitalists. Invested Development operates in a similar fashion, with a focus on for-profit social enterprise.

In June, Fast Company ran an article titled, “Why Social Investing is a Crock.” The basis for the argument is the lack of randomized control studies which would measure the creation of impact by comparison. Such studies would gauge if there really is a difference made thanks to impact investing in a social enterprise or microfinancing. Sasha Dichter, the Director of Business Development at the Acumen Fund, wrote a rebuttal arguing that resources within a social enterprise aren’t typically going to be allocated to conducting an impact study. The example Sasha uses is cell phone adoption among the BoP, which have had undeniable economic and social impact, yet nobody has done a randomized control test to see if the impact really exists. Ultimately, an impact investor is seeking to “identify products and services that make a material positive impact on the lives of poor people” and “create business models that make the cost of providing each incremental product go down to zero…and beyond (meaning, you make a profit).” We wholeheartedly agree with Sasha on those two points, which is why we seek to invest in for-profit start ups that work and innovative in the mobile technology and clean energy fields.

Fast Company later went on to interview Sasha to promote the conversation within the space on why social impact investing is not a crock. In his blog post, he defended the existence of impact by way of social investing without randomized control tests. In this interview, Dichter explains the functions of impact investing so readers can better understand the functions of impact investing. Dichter highlights that impact investing is a “profit seeking, not necessarily profit maximizing, endeavor” but admittedly has his challenges.  Funding, for example, is not necessarily the challenge, but rather organizations must find the talent that can deploy the capital in innovative ways. The model needs to work in order to allow funding to flow to those who need it.

An Interview with Antony Bugg-Levine:  Embracing Impact Investing” by Jocelyn Ling via Social Finance Canada
via Amazon
Newly named CEO of Nonprofit Finance Fund, Antony Bugg-Levine shares his thoughts on impact investing with Jocelyn Ling of Social Finance in a three part series. Bugg-Levine is also the Managing Director of the Rockefeller Foundation and GIIN board member. His new book, co-authored with Jed Emerson, is “Impact Investing: Transforming How We Make Money While Making a Differencethat offers an overview of the evolution and implications of impact investing. In Part I of the interview, Bugg-Levine outlines the content of the book and the purpose it aims to serve. Part II reiterates the book’s call to action, and invites those from all sectors and industries to embrace impact investing, whether actively or passively, in any way they can. In Part III, Bugg-Levine points out that the impact investing community needs to action, not rhetoric, as goes the classic phrase, actions speak louder than words. The activity in the space over the years has produced excellent momentum, which will continue to gain. 


Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Learn more about BETA